Samsung Galaxy S11+: here's what could be wrong with those renders

Steve Hemmerstoffer has a pretty amazing track record when it comes to leaking phones. This year alone he has revealed the designs of Apple's iPhone 11, the OnePlus 7T, Samsung's Galaxy Note 10, the Sony Xperia 5, and many others months ahead of their official introductions. But sometimes, as is inevitable, he makes a few mistakes. 

Early renders of Google’s Pixel 4 misrepresented the camera layout when published back in June, while the first batch of Galaxy S10 images featured thicker bezels when first unveiled in late 2018. Hemmerstoffer released renders of his latest scoop, the Galaxy S11+, just a few days ago yet one tipster believes they're slightly inaccurate due to the CAD files upon which they're based. Today, he has revealed why. 

Samsung's real camera layout might not be nearly as messy

Upon first glance, the most shocking element of the Samsung Galaxy S11+ design renders is the camera module that sits on the back. It's absolutely massive and possibly the biggest ever seen on a smartphone, but despite all of the comments suggesting otherwise, it now seems as though the dimensions are indeed accurately represented. The sensors sitting inside the area are a whole different story, though.

It's quite fair to say that the camera layout is a little messy. The rendered setup shows almost zero uniformity or alignment and doesn't appear to have been created with aesthetics in mind. Fortunately, Ice Universe believes that the module's current layout is wrong. In fact, he says the "real" Galaxy S11+ features a "neat" sensor layout.

The tipster in question didn't go into much detail yet the most logical layout likely involves aligning the two sensors on the left. Moving the central camera and LED flash upwards and towards the middle while also shifting the right column of components upwards a little could make things look better too. To give you an idea of what these changes may look like, we've created a quick mock-up which can be compared above with Steve Hemmerstoffer's original render. Do note that the corrections have only been based on guesses, though.

The 5x zoom camera may also be misrepresented 

Beyond the layout of the camera module, Ice Universe says the way Samsung's periscope camera has been depicted isn't right. Periscope-like lenses use square-shaped openings to gather extra light but in the renders provided by Hemmerstoffer, none of the cameras feature such a solution. Therefore, the Galaxy S11+ images are either inaccurate or Samsung has ditched plans to introduce support for true 5x optical zoom.

As things stand, Samsung's next-generation flagship is expected to make use of a new dual-zoom system. If true, the implementation above will be accompanied by a separate 2x or 3x telephoto camera, therefore allowing users to take photos at any zoom level between 1x and 5x without needing to worry about low-quality photos.

Xiaomi recently unveiled a low-cost version of this system on the penta-camera Mi Note 10 Pro. The latter pairs a regular 2x telephoto camera with a second shooter that's capable of producing what the company advertises as 5x optical zoom. In reality, it uses an 8-megapixel 3.7x telephoto camera which is later cropped down to 5-megapixels to achieve 5x optical zoom, hence the lack of a square-shaped opening on the phone.

It's certainly possible Samsung is planning to replicate Xiaomi's setup on the Galaxy S11+, which would explain the lack of a square-shaped opening in the renders, but it's also highly unlikely. After all, the Galaxy S11+ will be marketed as a premium phone and priced accordingly, meaning premium components are planned for all aspects of the phone, the camera department included.



1. Atrixboyyy

Posts: 624; Member since: Nov 03, 2011

Still hideous and I'm a fan of Samsungs phones

2. ahmadkun

Posts: 705; Member since: May 02, 2016

I don't know bro, i don't like this at all I'm just going to get the S10 and stay away till maybe 2022

7. JCASS889 unregistered

People care way to much about what there phone looks like, if it works and is functional for you then who cares what it looks like. And if people mock you for having an ugly phone then you need to find better people to hang around.

3. Amw86

Posts: 45; Member since: Oct 14, 2013

I don't care what it looks like, its a tool, does it work well? then awesome

4. MsPooks

Posts: 315; Member since: Jul 08, 2019

The domino chip looks much better symmetrical. I'm with Amw86: function trumps form. But those cameras had better be something special!

5. darkkjedii

Posts: 31782; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

The Pro Max had an odd looking setup, that eventually grew on me, this one will too. As they put more cameras in a small space, what do we expect, other than a cramped look? The Note 10/+ nailed it to me. As Long as they perform, that's all that really matters.

6. Alcyone

Posts: 621; Member since: May 10, 2018

If it really sticks to that design, I'd be surprised. Not sure removing the ability to measure certain health factors is a good idea. Some may say its a gimmick/lame, but I've found it useful on my s9+, and even used it the prior s7 edge. Supplementary to the measurements from my galaxy watch.

8. Chuck007

Posts: 1419; Member since: Mar 02, 2014

I'd take a top-notch camera experience over a nicer looking phone any day.

10. joey18

Posts: 693; Member since: Jul 20, 2010

too much drama believe this is much better then the iphone my iphone ll 2 cameras is same 3 pass iphones
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless
捕鱼达人5破解版内购下 免费填大坑下载 深圳福利彩票中心官网 捕鱼电玩城官方下载 手机麻将神器免费下 股票超短线高手的经 广西棋牌游戏 街机捕鱼大富豪破解版下载 正宗广东麻将推倒胡 什么游戏可以赚钱 免费四人单机无网麻将 新未来分分彩软件 炒股融资正规平台 追光娱乐4.3.2 三个半波中特论坛 手机北京麻将 彩库宝典图库2020